MCG Reports
Comparison of Performance of Alternative Miniature Imagers
(Comparative performance in projection and personal displays)
by Charles McLaughlin | chuck@mcgweb.com | Telephone: 650 323 7155
and Dave Armitage | darmit7644@aol.com
___________________________________________________
List of Tables
Table 2-1 |
Comparison of Current and Future Imagers |
24 |
Table 2-2 |
Requirements for Projection vs. Personal Viewers |
26 |
Table 2-3 |
Comparison of Color Systems |
30 |
Table 2-4 |
Alternative Color Systems |
32 |
Table 2-5 |
Comparison of Transmissive and Reflective Imaging Systems |
33 |
Table 2-6 |
Comparison of MID Classes |
34 |
Table 2-7 |
types of Liquid Crystal MIDs |
35 |
Table 2-8 |
Types of Microelectromechanical MIDs |
37 |
Table 2-9 |
Types of Emissive and Scanned MIDs |
37 |
Table 2-10 |
Comparison of Alternative MID Technologies |
39 |
Table 2-11 |
Throughput Efficiency Variables |
42 |
Table 2-12 |
Comparison of MID Efficiency(%) |
43 |
Table 2-13 |
Projector Parameter Description |
46 |
Table 2-14 |
Comparison of Overall Throughput Efficiency |
49 |
Table 2-15 |
Compactness Portability and Image Quality |
51 |
Table 2-16 |
Field of View for Typical Objects |
54 |
Table 2-17 |
Transmissive vs. Reflective Viewers |
60 |
Table 2-18 |
Lumens per Watt for Various Personal Viewers |
62 |
Table 4-1 |
Imaging Capability of Alternative Projection MIDs |
67 |
Table 4-2 |
Parameter Description |
69 |
Table 4-3 |
Lamp Parameters |
70 |
Table 4-4 |
Projector System Losses |
73 |
Table 4-5 |
Comparison with Published Data |
73 |
Table 4-6 |
MID Definition and Diagonal |
75 |
Table 4-7 |
Aperture Values |
76 |
Table 4-8 |
Effective Transmission Values |
77 |
Table 4-9 |
Summary of Projection Comparisons |
77 |
Table 4-10 |
Etendue Related Assumption |
78 |
Table 4-11 |
Large Area MID Performance |
81 |
Table 4-12 |
Color Sequential SXGA MID Performance |
82 |
Table 4-13 |
Comparison of Projection Imagers |
84 |
Table 5-1 |
Personal Display Color Options |
89 |
Table 5-2 |
Personal Display Developers |
90 |
Table 5-3 |
Rating of Alternative Imagers |
91 |
Table 5-4 |
Electro-Optic Power Requirements |
93 |
Table 5-5 |
Buss Line Power Requirements |
94 |
Table 5-6 |
Exit Pupil Limitations |
95 |
Table 5-7 |
Overall Rating of alternative Personal Display MIDs |
96 |
Table 5-8 |
Strengths and Weaknesses of Personal Display Alternatives |
97 |
Table A-1 |
Liquid Crystal Cell Parameters |
104 |
Table A-2 |
NLC Cell Configurations and Parameters |
106 |
Table A-3 |
MID Matrix Addressing Power |
115 |
Table A-4 |
MID Summary |
116 |
Table B-1 |
Computed DMD Results for f=2.88 and (=550-nm |
120 |
Table B-2 |
Pixel Diffractive Loss at Pixel Diffractive Loss at (=550-nm |
121 |
Table B-3 |
Small Area Diffraction Efficiency |
121 |
Table C-1 |
Square Wave Phase Grating Diffraction Efficiency |
124 |
Table C-2 |
GLV Performance for T1=100% |
131 |
Table C-3 |
GLV Performance for mirror gap=28m with outer rejected |
132 |
Table C-4 |
Diffraction Efficiencies for Sinusoidal Phase Grating |
133 |
Table C-5 |
Deformable Mirror Grating Performance |
134 |
Table C-6 |
Parameters |
136 |
Table D-1 |
Magnifier Parameters |
137 |
Table D-2 |
Magnifier Values |
139 |
Table E-1 |
Parameter Description |
142 |
Table E-2 |
SXGA Resolution at 17-µPixel Pitch |
143 |
Table E-3 |
VGA Resolution at 17-µPixel Pitch |
144 |
Table E-4 |
Large Area Performance |
145 |
Table E-5 |
Existing Projector Performance |
145 |
Return to the summary - Alternative Miniature Imagers Performance
View a Table of Contents for this report
View a List of Figures for this report
