McLaughlin Consulting Group

Site Search

 

This Site The Web
Licensing
-Fergason Patent Properties
Conference
-Display Summit China 2006
-Projection Summit 2007
Presentations
-Projection Summit 2004
-Elec. Displays Market Overview
-The Rise and Stall of PDLC
Custom Studies
-Niche Markets for OLEDs
-3D: Opportunities, Players, and Displays
Click here for information on this research
 
Register for McLaughlin Consulting Group email updates

 

 

MCG Reports

Comparison of Performance of Alternative Miniature Imagers
(Comparative performance in projection and personal displays)
by Charles McLaughlin | chuck@mcgweb.com | Telephone: 650 323 7155
and Dave Armitage | darmit7644@aol.com

___________________________________________________

List of Tables 

Table 2-1

Comparison of Current and Future Imagers

24

Table 2-2

Requirements for Projection vs. Personal Viewers

26

Table 2-3

Comparison of Color Systems

30

Table 2-4

Alternative Color Systems

32

Table 2-5

Comparison of Transmissive and Reflective Imaging Systems

33

Table 2-6

Comparison of MID Classes

34

Table 2-7

types of Liquid Crystal MIDs

35

Table 2-8

Types of Microelectromechanical MIDs

37

Table 2-9

Types of Emissive and Scanned MIDs

37

Table 2-10

Comparison of Alternative MID Technologies

39

Table 2-11

Throughput Efficiency Variables

42

Table 2-12

Comparison of MID Efficiency(%)

43

Table 2-13

Projector Parameter Description

46

Table 2-14

Comparison of Overall Throughput Efficiency

49

Table 2-15

Compactness Portability and Image Quality

51

Table 2-16

Field of View for Typical Objects

54

Table 2-17

Transmissive vs. Reflective Viewers

60

Table 2-18

Lumens per Watt for Various Personal Viewers

62

Table 4-1

Imaging Capability of Alternative Projection MIDs

67

Table 4-2

Parameter Description

69

Table 4-3

Lamp Parameters

70

Table 4-4

Projector System Losses

73

Table 4-5

Comparison with Published Data

73

Table 4-6

MID Definition and Diagonal

75

Table 4-7

Aperture Values

76

Table 4-8

Effective Transmission Values

77

Table 4-9

Summary of Projection Comparisons

77

Table 4-10

Etendue Related Assumption

78

Table 4-11

Large Area MID Performance

81

Table 4-12

Color Sequential SXGA MID Performance

82

Table 4-13

Comparison of Projection Imagers

84

Table 5-1

Personal Display Color Options

89

Table 5-2

Personal Display Developers

90

Table 5-3

Rating of Alternative Imagers

91

Table 5-4

Electro-Optic Power Requirements

93

Table 5-5

Buss Line Power Requirements

94

Table 5-6

Exit Pupil Limitations

95

Table 5-7

Overall Rating of alternative Personal Display MIDs

96

Table 5-8

Strengths and Weaknesses of Personal Display Alternatives

97

Table A-1

Liquid Crystal Cell Parameters

104

Table A-2

NLC Cell Configurations and Parameters

106

Table A-3

MID Matrix Addressing Power

115

Table A-4

MID Summary

116

Table B-1

Computed DMD Results for f=2.88 and (=550-nm

120

Table B-2

Pixel Diffractive Loss at Pixel Diffractive Loss at (=550-nm

121

Table B-3

Small Area Diffraction Efficiency

121

Table C-1

Square Wave Phase Grating Diffraction Efficiency

124

Table C-2

GLV Performance for T1=100%

131

Table C-3

GLV Performance for mirror gap=28m with outer rejected

132

Table C-4

Diffraction Efficiencies for Sinusoidal Phase Grating

133

Table C-5

Deformable Mirror Grating Performance

134

Table C-6

Parameters

136

Table D-1

Magnifier Parameters

137

Table D-2

Magnifier Values

139

Table E-1

Parameter Description

142

Table E-2

SXGA Resolution at 17-µPixel Pitch

143

Table E-3

VGA Resolution at 17-µPixel Pitch

144

Table E-4

Large Area Performance

145

Table E-5

Existing Projector Performance

145

Return to the summary - Alternative Miniature Imagers Performance
View a Table of Contents for this report
View a List of Figures for this report